Arcadia "21 Children" Surrogacy Case: Zhang & Xuan Updates
On Fertility Ground Surrogacy

Surrogacy News

The Arcadia "21 Children" Surrogacy Case: Latest Updates on Silvia Zhang and Guojun Xuan

September 3, 2026 · 8 min read · On Fertility Ground Surrogacy

The Arcadia "21 Children" Surrogacy Case: Latest Updates on Silvia Zhang and Guojun Xuan

The case out of Arcadia, California, is one of the most disturbing surrogacy stories in recent memory — and a stark warning about what can happen when the people running an agency are also its clients. Here is what happened and where it stands.

What Happened

In May 2025, Arcadia police were alerted after a two-month-old was hospitalized with a traumatic head injury and intracranial bleeding. Investigators reviewing home surveillance concluded that a nanny, Chunmei Li, 56, had violently shaken the infant, and that the child was not taken for medical care for two days. The parents — Silvia Zhang, 38, and Guojun Xuan, 65 — were arrested on suspicion of felony child endangerment and neglect and later released on bail. An arrest warrant was issued for Li, who as of the latest reporting remained at large.

It is worth being precise: the direct abuse allegations center on the nanny, and Zhang and Xuan have not been accused of physically harming the children themselves.

Twenty-One Children

As the investigation widened, authorities removed 21 children into protective custody — 15 from the couple's roughly 10,000-square-foot, nine-bedroom Arcadia home and six more from other residences. The children ranged in age from two months to 13 years, most of them under three. Many were born through surrogacy, with Zhang listed as the mother on birth certificates, some issued out of state.

The Agency Was Theirs

This is the detail that shook the surrogacy world: the couple owned the surrogacy operation. Business records tie them to agencies including Mark Surrogacy (Mark Surrogacy Investment LLC) and Future Spring Surrogacy, which recruited surrogates through Facebook. Multiple surrogates — among them a Texas woman, Kayla Elliott — have said they were told the couple had only one child and simply wanted a sibling, and that they never knew the intended parents also owned the very agency vetting and guiding them.

Court records reportedly show Zhang told a judge the couple had at least a dozen children. Surrogates say they were paid tens of thousands of dollars each and told they were helping a couple struggling with infertility.

The Latest Updates

As of the most recent reporting, neither Zhang nor Xuan had been criminally charged over the surrogacy operation itself, though their legal troubles have mounted and the FBI has been involved. In the months after the raid, the couple reportedly welcomed at least five more surrogate-born babies in Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Georgia — all of whom were taken into state custody — and they have been fighting for custody across multiple states. In some cases they sued the surrogates who declined to hand over newborns, alleging breach of contract and seeking large sums. A neighboring city separately filed a civil nuisance action against one of Xuan's properties.

Because criminal and family-court matters like these can take a long time, the full picture is still developing. As with any accusation, the parties are entitled to a presumption of innocence unless and until proven otherwise in court.

The Real Lesson: Conflicts of Interest and Red Flags

The heart of this case is a conflict of interest so large it is hard to overstate: an agency owned by the intended parents means no one independent is protecting the surrogate. The people "vetting" her were the people she was carrying for.

Warning signs worth knowing:

  • You never meet or verify the intended parents, or the details you are told keep shifting.
  • The agency is registered to a private home, and ownership is vague or hard to confirm.
  • You are discouraged from retaining your own independent attorney.
  • You feel pressure, secrecy, or a push to move faster than feels right.

The protection against all of this is an independent, transparent agency and your own legal counsel. Our guides on how to vet a surrogacy agency and navigating Facebook surrogacy groups safely go deeper on exactly these red flags.

At On Fertility Ground, ownership is clear, matching is honest, and every surrogate has an independent attorney whose only job is to protect her. If you want a straightforward way to evaluate any agency — ours includedask us for our free vetting checklist.

Sources

Bree — Founder & CEO

From Our Founder

Bree — Founder & CEO, On Fertility Ground

When this story broke, my phone lit up with messages from surrogates asking the same question: "How would I even know?" And that's the part that keeps me up at night — the women in this case did what most people would do. They trusted the agency that was supposed to be vetting everyone.

So let me give you the one question that would have unraveled this entire situation: "Who owns this agency, and can I verify it?" Ask it of every agency you talk to, including mine. I'll answer in one sentence with public records to back it up. Any agency that can't — or won't — has told you everything you need to know.

— Bree | info@onfertilityground.com · Meet Bree →

Ready to Learn More?

Whether you're considering surrogacy as a surrogate or an intended parent, we're here to answer every question personally.

Email us at info@onfertilityground.com — We answer every inquiry personally.

Keep reading

← Back to the blog